剑庭安
首页
黑客安全首页全部安全栏目 黑客技术黑客技术、渗透测试、漏洞利用工具与教程 安全软件安全工具、扫描器、检测与审计软件 病毒分析恶意软件分析、样本、逆向与沙箱 CTF思路CTF 题目、writeup、解题思路与工具 防护思路防御技术、加固、检测响应与蓝队 红蓝攻防红队攻击模拟、蓝队对抗、攻防演练 漏洞知识库漏洞、CVE、PoC、EXP 与安全研究
逆向|反编译
PHP源码PHP 网站源码、程序、系统 APP源码安卓/iOS APP 源码 ASP源码ASP 网站源码与程序 NET源码.NET 网站源码与系统 小程序源码微信/支付宝小程序源码 Dedecms风格模板Dedecms 织梦风格模板 Empirecms风格模板EmpireCMS 帝国风格模板 Discuz商业模板/插件Discuz 商业模板与插件 WordPress主题/插件WordPress 主题与插件 其它源码、模板其它各类源码与模板 游戏源码游戏源码与引擎项目 加密货币源码加密货币、区块链、钱包、USDT/比特币相关源码与工具 手游源码手机游戏源码、服务端、客户端与引擎项目 传奇源码热血传奇、传奇世界、复古传奇等客户端/服务端/引擎源码 页游源码网页游戏、H5 游戏、浏览器游戏源码 端游源码电脑单机游戏、PC 网游客户端/服务端源码
最新万能免驱动支持所有型号打印机下载程序 日历天气老黄历 · 每天同步真实日期与天气
站长工具站长工具 自助开通会员浏览该分类 其他资源qtziy SEO工具SEO工具 站群源码站群源码 泛程序泛程序 蜘蛛模板蜘蛛模板 蜘蛛池蜘蛛池 外链工具外链工具
搜索 自助开通会员🔓 破甲 API
登录 注册
首页 分类列表 病毒分析 EDR-GhostLocker - AppLocker-…
病毒分析
作者:admin 发布:2026-10-05

EDR-GhostLocker - AppLocker-Based EDR Neutralization

项目说明GhostLocker: AppLocker-Based EDR NeutralizationIntroductionAfter my article on Fairy-Law, where I used kernel mitigations to disable Endpoint Dete…
资源可下载 免费下载 0 条讨论
会员资源
开通会员后即可下载全部资源。
登录后开通会员
会员方案
323浏览量
0讨论
2下载链接
可下载资源状态
内容可验证
更新 2026-10-05
人工审核发布
评论区答疑

项目说明

GhostLocker: AppLocker-Based EDR Neutralization

Introduction

After my article on Fairy-Law, where I used kernel mitigations to disable Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) solutions, di pointed out that IFEO exclusions (Image File Execution Options) were too in for third-party applications. This led to a better approach: le the inherent power administrators already possess through AppLocker.

The concept was inspired by di, who highlighted that administrators can legitimately control any software on their systems. From that insight, I de a technique using AppLocker as a nati control mechanism. This research explores the technical implementation of AppLocker for EDR control, comparing it with WDAC and presenting a practical proof-of-concept tool.

---

AppLocker: Application Whitelisting Architecture

AppLocker was introduced with Windows 7 and enhanced in Windows 8.1, 10 (Enterprise) and Windows Server 2012/R2/2016+. It is an application whitelisting framework that allows administrators to define precisely which executables, scripts, or installers may execute for specific users or groups.

Internal Architecture (Windows Internals Perspective)

#### User-Mode & Kernel Components:

AppIDS Identity Service)

  • Runs under LocalService account

  • Monitors registry changes to AppLocker policy paths

  • Translates XML-based rule definitions into binary SDDL (Security Descriptor Definition Language)

  • Communicates policy updates to kernel driver
  • AppID.sys (Kernel Driver)

  • Intercepts process creation events through callback mechanisms

  • Performs rule e using SeSrpAccessCheck

  • Optionally monitors DLL loads (disabled by default for performance reasons)
  • > Clarification:
    > While AppID.sys performs rule e in kernel mode, DLL enforcement is not autonomous.
    > The kernel driver does not actively monitor DLL loads by itself. Instead, user-mode components must explicitly query the driver to determine whether a DLL load is permitted.
    > As a result, AppLocker DLL rules effectively act as a client-side protection mechanism.

    Rule Types and Enforcement

    AppLocker supports two primary rule categories:

    Allow Rules: Explicitly permit defined applications to execute

    Deny Rules: Explicitly block defined applications from executing

  • Deny rules always take precedence o rules

  • Can include exceptions for specific conditions

  • Support user and group-le
  • Rule Criteria (AppID Attributes):

  • Path-based rules: C:\Program Files\Security\*.exe

  • Hash-based rules: SHA256 Authenticode hash

  • Publisher rules: Digital signature, , product name

  • File attribute rules: Company name, product , etc.
  • Registry Storage Locations:

    Service & SYSTEM Process Enforcement (Often O)

    By default, AppLocker does not enforce rules on services or SYSTEM processes.
    There is no graphical user interface option to enable this behavior.

    Enforcement for services can only be enabled via the XML policy using RuleCollectionExtensions.

    The following policy section is required to enforce AppLocker rules on services:

    As indicated by the extension names, these options are supported only on Windows 10+ and are not a on earlier .
    See Microsoft - AppLocker rule collection extensions

    Enforcement Flow:

    1. Windows notifies AppID driver on process creation
    2. AppID.sys e application attributes
    3. Based on AppLocker rules, it allows or blocks the process
    4. If blocked, process creation is aborted with STATUS_ACCESS_DISABLED_BY_POLICY_OTHER

    Critical Limitation:

    ⚠️ AppLocker does NOT terminate running processes.

    AppLocker enforcement only applies to new process creation events. Already-running EDR processes continue executing until system reboot. This is a fundamental architectural constraint.

    Kernel Dri Caveat:

    E blocking EDR userland executables, kernel drivers (*.sys) remain active and operational. These drivers continue:

  • Registering kernel callbacks (process, thread, image load, registry)

  • Collecting telemetry data

  • Monitoring system events
  • However, extensi reveals that this telemetry becomes functionally ineffecti userland analysis engines, correlation systems, and reporting mechanisms, the raw telemetry data cannot be processed into actionable detections. EDR solutions rely heavily on userland components for:

  • Event correlation and beha analysis

  • Machine learning inference

  • Alert generation and response orchestration

  • Communication with management consoles
  • ---

    GhostLocker: Proof-of-Concept Implementation

    Tool O

    GhostLocker is a C++ implementation that automates AppLocker policy deployment to block EDR executables.

    Technical Implementation Analysis


    #### Implementation

    GhostLocker provides two implementation :

    #### main.cpp – Dynamic Enumeration
    This enumerates running processes and resol full image paths using native APIs (NtQuerySystemInformation).
    The resol paths are then used to generate precise AppLocker deny rules.

    The tool uses CreateToolhelp32Snapshot with TH32CS_SNAPPROCESS to enumerate all running processes. It compares process names against a predefined target list using case-insensiti (_wcsicmp).

    Why this approach?

  • Lightweight and fast enumeration

  • No elevated pri required for reading process list

  • Case-insensiti handles naming
  • #### 1. Process Enumeration (FindTargetsAndQueryPaths)

    #### 2. Path Resolution tion

    Technical Details:

  • Uses undocumented SystemProcessIdInformation (0x58) information class

  • Returns NT device path format: \Device\Harddisk\Windows\System32\...

  • Requires con to Win32 path format for AppLocker compatibility
  • Path Con Logic:

    Limitation: Hardcoded Harddisk assumption. Should be improved to dynamically resol numbers.

    #### 3. PowerShell Policy Generation

    The tool embeds a complete PowerShell script that:

    a) Target Paths

    b) Generates Dynamic Deny Rules

    Key Policy Elements:

  • UserOrGroupSid="S-1-1-0": Applies to E (all users)

  • Action="Deny": Explicit block rule

  • EnforcementMode="Enabled": Acti for EXE rules

  • Deny rules inserted before fallback allow rules (precedence)
  • c) Policy Application

    #### 4. Base64 Encoding and Execution

    Technical Reasoning:

  • UTF-16LE encoding: PowerShell -EncodedCommand expects UTF-16LE

  • Base64 encoding: Bypasses command-line character restrictions

  • -ExecutionPolicy Bypass: Ignores script execution policy

  • runas verb: Triggers UAC ele for administrati
  • #### main_improved.cpp – Static Wildcard-Based
    After clarification from di, it became clear that AppLocker path rules support wildcard matching and do not require full executable paths.

    This impro removes all process enumeration and native path resolution logic and instead relies on static wildcard rules such as: *\MsMpEng.exe

    ---

    Requirements

    ⚠️ Prerequisites for Successful Deployment:

  • Must execute from elevated (Administrator) context

  • AppIDS must be running: sc start AppIDSvc

  • System reboot required post-deployment for full effecti

  • Target EDR processes must be running during enumeration phase
  • ---

    Research Results: Real-World EDR Testing

    Testing Methodology

    Extensi testing was conducted against multiple commercial EDR solutions to e effecti.

    Test En:

  • Windows 11 (25H2)

  • Multiple commercial EDR products (names withheld)

  • Baseline detection: simple process injection techniques

  • Pre-test : confirmed EDR detection capabilities
  • Key Findings

    #### Detection Capabilities Post-Block

    Beha Analysis Failure:

  • All tested EDR solutions failed to generate alerts after AppLocker blocking

  • Pre simple injections went undetected

  • No beha detections triggered for suspicious acti
  • Management Console Perspective:

  • Agents continued reporting as "online" and "protected"

  • Last-seen timestamps updated normally

  • No indication of compromise from management interface
  • #### Kernel Dri Analysis

    Despite kernel drivers continuing to run and collect telemetry data streams, the absence of userland processing components rendered collected data ineffective.

    What Continues Working:

  • Kernel callbacks fire normally (process, thread, image load, registry, etc.)

  • Raw telemetry data collection persists

  • Dri communication may function
  • Critical Insight:

    Modern EDR architecture relies on a tight coupling between kernel drivers and userland analysis engines.
    Breaking this coupling effectively blinds the EDR despite continued telemetry collection.

    Screenshot (Enumerating and applying the AppLocker-Policy):
    <img width="3102" height="1237" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-09 153050" src=" />

    Screenshot (Deactivated WinDefend):

    <img width="785" height="562" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-10 092525" src=" />

    <img width="1242" height="927" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-10 123246" src=" />

    Screenshot of 2
    <img width="2192" height="517" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-19 152900" src=" />

    ---

    Comparison: WDAC

    What is WDAC?

    Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) was introduced in Windows 10 and represents Microsoft's modern application control framework.
    It enforces policies on both user-mode and kernel-mode binaries.

    #### WDAC Architecture:

    Core Characteristics:

  • System-wide enforcement (all users, all sessions)

  • Pre-boot enforcement

  • Default-deny model

  • Code Integrity (CI) policy engine

  • Kernel dri enforcement
  • WDAC Policy Storage:

    WDAC as Attack : Krueger

    Krueger demonstrated WDAC abuse for EDR dri:

    Key Difference:

  • WDAC blocks at driver load time (kernel)

  • AppLocker blocks at process creation time (userland)
  • Detailed Comparison Matrix

    | Feature | AppLocker | WDAC |
    |---------|-----------|------|
    | Enforcement Scope | User-mode executables only | User-mode + kernel-mode drivers |
    | Enforcement Timing | Process creation | Boot + runtime |
    | User Granularity | Per-user/group rules | System-wide |
    | Default Mode | Allow-by-default | Deny-by-default |
    | Rule Types | Path, Hash, Publisher | Hash, Publisher, WHQLFile, |
    | Blocks Drivers | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
    | Policy Complexity | Moderate | High |
    | Audit Mode | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |

    Practical Attack Considerations

    When to Use AppLocker (GhostLocker):

  • Goal is userland process blocking only

  • Want to maintain kernel dri (less suspicious)

  • Need user-scoped policies for targeted blocking
  • When to Use WDAC (Krueger-style):

  • Need complete dri blocking

  • Target has no WDAC enforcement
  • ---

    Detection & Pre Guidance

    1. Pre-Execution Policy E

    Windows provides the Get-AppLockerFileInformation API, which allows testing whether a specific executable would be blocked under the current AppLocker policy.

    An EDR can use this mechanism to proactively whether its own binaries or services would be denied execution after a policy change.
    If a core component transitions from allowed to denied, this should be treated as a high-confidence tamper condition.

    2. AppLocker Policy Change Monitoring

    AppLocker policy updates are communicated to AppID.sys IOCTL calls from user mode.
    This provides a clear signal path indicating that enforcement state has changed.

    Kernel drivers can obser notifications and correlate them with subsequent execution failures of protected services, enabling accurate detection of policy-based neutralization.

    3. Persistence and Reboot Correlation

    AppLocker policies are persisted across reboots in well-defined registry locations.
    EDR solutions can snapshot relevant policy state before reboot and enforcement consistency after system startup.

    A mismatch between expected execution state and post-reboot enforcement strongly indicates intentional policy manipulation.

    4. Built-in Exclusion Mechanisms

    Windows includes nati for excluding processes from SRP/AppLocker enforcement.
    Security products are expected to integrate with these mechanisms to ensure operational continuity.

    Failure to account for these exclusions is not a limitation of AppLocker, but rather an architectural o in the protected product.

    Summary

    None of these detection strategies require bypassing AppLocker or Windows security boundaries.
    They rely solely on documented behavior and interfaces already provided by the operating system.

    ---

    Conclusion

    GhostLocker demonstrates that AppLocker, a legitimate Windows security feature, can be weaponized to neutralize EDR solutions through userland process blocking.
    This research highlights fundamental architectural in current EDR designs that tightly couple kernel telemetry collection with userland analysis engines.

    Key Takeaways:

    1. AppLocker Effecti: Successfully blocks EDR userland processes across multiple
    2. Architectural : Kernel drivers continue running but become functionally blind without userland processing
    3. Detection Blindness: Tested EDRs showed complete detection failure post-blocking
    4. Management Console Deception: Agents appear "online" and "protected" despite compromise
    5. System-Nati: Uses legitimate Windows features

    For future a C# Implementation:

  • Pure .NET in-memory execution (better OPSEC)

  • Direct API usage without PowerShell dependencies
  • ---

    Disclaimer

    This research is provided for educational and defensi purposes only.
    The techniques described should only be used in authorized testing en with explicit permission.

    ---

    References & Further Reading

  • Windows Internals, Part 1 & 2 (7th Edition)

  • AppLocker Technical Reference

  • WDAC Design Guide

  • Krueger: WDAC Abuse Tool
  • ---

    Community Contributions Welcome

    If you are interested in contributing to GhostLocker, especially to the C# implementation, you are very welcome.

    ---

    项目信息

    开发语言:C

    Star 数:343

    技术要点

    该项目属于病毒分析方向的开源资源,代码结构清晰,适合安全研究人员学习参考。项目围绕AppLocker-Based EDR Neutralization展开,提供了可运行的实现,对理解相关安全机制、工具原理与攻防技术具有较高的研究价值。

    从技术实现角度看,此类项目的核心在于对底层原理的深入理解与工程化落地。开发者在研究过程中可以结合官方文档与社区讨论,梳理项目的初始化流程、核心模块职责与数据流转,逐步掌握其中的技术细节与设计思路。

    使用与学习建议

    1. 下载源码压缩包,解压到本地环境。

    2. 根据项目类型准备对应的运行环境与依赖。

    3. 按照 README 中的步骤完成配置与部署。

    4. 在隔离的测试环境中运行验证,避免影响生产系统。

    免责声明

    本资源来源于开源社区,仅供安全研究、技术学习与合法授权范围内的攻防演练使用,请勿用于任何非法或侵害他人权益的用途。使用本项目产生的一切后果由使用者自行承担。

    资源标题EDR-GhostLocker - AppLocker-Based EDR Neutralization
    所属分类病毒分析
    发布作者admin
    发布时间2026-10-05 23:22:08
    下载权限 免费下载
    附件数量2 个下载链接
    浏览次数323
    讨论数量0
    主题状态正常讨论中

    本资源免费,登录后即可在本页「下载链接」区域获取全部附件。

    请在评论区留言说明具体链接,或联系作者补档。楼主更新后本页会同步最新的下载地址。

    请先阅读正文中的授权说明;未注明的默认仅限站内学习交流,禁止直接搬运到其他站点二次售卖。
    还没有讨论,快来抢沙发~
    登录 后才能参与讨论
    下载链接
    会员才能下载
    登录后开通会员
    同分类推荐
    暂无同类资源
    免费登录即可下载
    查看会员
    放大预览

    © 2026 剑庭安 - 网站开发定制 SEO 优化蜘蛛池代做 在线看手相算命. 保留所有权利。

    Powered by 酷像SEOv3.0

    网站地图 Sitemap.xml
    首页 全部分类 黑客安全 逆向|反编译 精品源码 站长工具自助开通会员其他资源SEO工具站群源码泛程序蜘蛛模板蜘蛛池外链工具创意乐园 搜索 会员服务 登录 注册