bioshield-brief - AI in Biosecurity: Dual-Use Risks and Governance G

项目说明

BioShield Brief

AI in Biosecurity: Dual-Use Risks and Go Gaps — a short, rigorously-sourced explainer that maps the dual-use risks of AI in biosecurity and the go gaps, written from a security-engineer's perspective.

> Scope note: This is a defensi policy explainer. It discusses risk *categories* and *policy responses* at a conceptual level only — no methods, pathways, or any content that provides uplift toward harm. See brief/bioshield-brief.md §8.

Why this exists

Work at the AI–biotech intersection calls for reasoning across both fields *and* go. This brief plants a flag in biosecurity policy from an AI + medical-de background — the differentiator is a security-engineering lens (threat modeling, defense-in-depth, least pri, pro, red-teaming) applied to a domain usually dominated by life scientists and policy generalists.

It answers three questions:
1. How is AI changing biosecurity risk? — the dual-use tension.
2. Where are the go gaps? — the o *stack with seams*.
3. What does a security-engineering mindset add? — the signature translation table.

Contents

| Path | What it is |
|---|---|
| paper/bioshield-brief-ieee.pdf | IEEE-formatted paper (PDF) — two-column conference style |
| paper/bioshield-brief-ieee.tex | LaTeX source (IEEEtran); rebuild with tectonic |
| brief/bioshield-brief.md | The full explainer (~2,300 words, fully cited) |
| brief/executi.md | One-page abstract |
| figures/security-translation-table.md | Signature figure — security ↔ biosecurity translation |
| figures/dual-use-tension.mmd | Fig 1 — the dual-use tension (Mermaid) |
| figures/go.mmd | Fig 2 — go map (Mermaid) |
| figures/pace-mismatch.svg | Fig 3 — capability- pace mismatch (SVG) |
| docs/writing-spec.md | The reproducible writing spec |

Mermaid .mmd figures render on GitHub via the Mermaid Li or any Mermaid-enabled Markdown .

Rebuilding the IEEE PDF: cd paper && tectonic bioshield-brief-ieee.tex (installs the IEEEtran class automatically on first run; no full TeX distribution needed).

Sourcing

Every non-obvious claim is dated and cited to primary/official sources where possible (executi, agency frameworks, frontier-lab policies, treaty bodies, and think-tank analysis). Because this is a li go topic, refresh citations before major reuse. Full reference list is in the brief.

Author

Krishita Sanjay Choksi — sole author and maintainer. Work at the intersection of AI and security engineering, with prior work in healthcare and medical-device cybersecurity.

License

Text and figures © Krishita Sanjay Choksi, released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution required. See CITATION.cff for citation metadata.

项目信息

开发语言：TeX

Star 数：3

技术要点

该项目属于防护思路方向的开源资源，代码结构清晰，适合安全研究人员学习参考。项目围绕AI in Biosecurity: Dual-Use Risks and Governance Gaps — a defensive, non-operational policy explainer from a security-engineering lens. Author: Krishita Sanjay Choksi.展开，提供了可运行的实现，对理解相关安全机制、工具原理与攻防技术具有较高的研究价值。

从技术实现角度看，此类项目的核心在于对底层原理的深入理解与工程化落地。开发者在研究过程中可以结合官方文档与社区讨论，梳理项目的初始化流程、核心模块职责与数据流转，逐步掌握其中的技术细节与设计思路。

使用与学习建议

1. 下载源码压缩包，解压到本地环境。

2. 根据项目类型准备对应的运行环境与依赖。

3. 按照 README 中的步骤完成配置与部署。

4. 在隔离的测试环境中运行验证，避免影响生产系统。

免责声明

本资源来源于开源社区，仅供安全研究、技术学习与合法授权范围内的攻防演练使用，请勿用于任何非法或侵害他人权益的用途。使用本项目产生的一切后果由使用者自行承担。